Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to be Deposed in Texas Facial Recognition Case

In a significant development, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is set to participate in a deposition as part of an ongoing lawsuit in Texas pertaining to the company’s facial recognition technology. A ruling by Justice Jeff Rambin of Texas’s Sixth Court of Appeals has denied Meta’s recent petition seeking relief from an order compelling the oral deposition of Zuckerberg, with the date remaining unspecified.


The lawsuit, initiated by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in February 2022, alleges that Meta has been capturing and utilizing the biometric data of millions of Texans without obtaining their informed consent. Furthermore, attorneys representing Texas have argued that Meta violated the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act by not disclosing crucial information, such as the collection of biometric identifiers, which influenced Texas users to utilize Facebook.

The state of Texas maintains that Mark Zuckerberg possesses unique personal knowledge of discoverable information relevant to their case. Texas alleges that Meta’s actions violated state laws concerning the collection of biometric data and deceptive trade practices.

This isn’t the first legal challenge Meta has faced regarding its facial recognition technology. In 2021, the company settled a class-action lawsuit related to facial recognition for a staggering $650 million. Attorneys involved in the case stated that this settlement was one of the largest ever recorded for a privacy violation, ensuring a minimum payout of $345 to each class member seeking compensation.

Implications for Meta and the Future of Facial Recognition Technology

The lawsuit against Meta and the outcome of Mark Zuckerberg’s deposition will undoubtedly have significant ramifications for both the company and the broader facial recognition technology sector. Depending on the evidence presented during the deposition, the legal proceedings could shed more light on Meta’s data collection practices and potentially impact public sentiment towards the company.

The case in Texas serves as a stark reminder that privacy concerns and ethical considerations surrounding biometric data remain at the forefront of discussions surrounding facial recognition technology. The allegations made against Meta highlight the importance of obtaining proper consent from users before capturing and utilizing their biometric information.

If the allegations against Meta are proven to be true, it could pave the way for stricter regulations and oversight of facial recognition technology. Governments, organizations, and the public, now more than ever, may demand greater transparency and accountability from companies involved in this field.


Google, Meta, and TikTok Reach Settlement on Fines in Russian Court


Protecting User Privacy and Informed Consent

While advancements in facial recognition technology have the potential to bring about positive changes in various industries, safeguarding user privacy must remain a top priority. The case against Meta underscores the need for companies to acquire explicit informed consent from users before collecting and using their biometric data.

Transparency plays a critical role in fostering trust between technology companies and users. By providing clear and comprehensive information about their data collection practices, companies can empower their users to make informed decisions regarding their privacy.

Regulators and lawmakers have an essential role to play in ensuring that clear guidelines and legislation are in place to protect the rights and privacy of individuals. Striking the right balance between the benefits and potential risks of facial recognition technology is crucial to protect both user privacy and foster innovation in the industry.

The Road Ahead for Meta and Facial Recognition Technology

The ongoing legal battle surrounding Meta’s facial recognition technology reflects the challenges faced by companies in navigating a rapidly evolving technological landscape. As the public becomes more aware of the potential risks associated with the misuse of biometric data, companies must adapt and prioritize privacy protections.

Meta, with its global presence and extensive resources, has the opportunity to lead by example in promoting responsible data practices. By addressing the concerns raised in the Texas lawsuit and reinforcing its commitment to user privacy, Meta can regain the trust of its users and establish itself as a responsible guardian of biometric data.

While the outcome of the lawsuit remains uncertain, it serves as a reminder that the use of facial recognition technology must be accompanied by robust privacy safeguards, stringent consent requirements, and continuous dialogue between technology companies, regulators, and the public.


As the legal proceedings unfold and the depositions take place, the implications of this case will reverberate throughout the technology industry. The outcome will not only influence Meta’s future but also impact how companies approach the implementation of facial recognition technology globally.


Google Settles $5 Billion Lawsuit Over Tracking Users in Incognito Mode


The deposition of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg in the ongoing Texas lawsuit surrounding facial recognition technology marks a significant development for both Meta and the technology industry as a whole. With the potential to set legal precedents and shape the future of facial recognition technology, the outcome of this case bears close observation. As discussions surrounding data privacy continue to gain traction, companies must heed the call to prioritize user privacy and reinforce public trust by adopting responsible data practices.

You May Also Like

More From Author

+ There are no comments

Add yours